Interested in a private company training? Request it here.
Not ready to book yet? Request an offer here.
Good architecture is about making good decisions over time, not about following rules or trends. This module explains why clear principles help teams make consistent choices and avoid confusion as systems and requirements change.
N-Tier architecture is still very common, often because it feels familiar and safe. This module explains why it became popular, what it does well, and why it can become a problem when applications grow larger.
Clean Architecture tries to keep business logic independent from frameworks and infrastructure. This module explains why this separation makes applications easier to test, change and maintain, while also showing where it can add extra complexity.
Mapping is often used to separate different models in an application, but it is not free. This module explains why mapping exists, what problems it tries to solve, and why too much mapping can slow teams down.
In layered architectures, small changes often touch many parts of the system. This module explains why organizing code around features can make applications easier to understand, change and maintain.
Data access is a frequent source of design problems in .NET applications. This module evaluates repository patterns, common pitfalls, and practical DbContext usage in both Clean Architecture and Vertical Slices.
Operations can succeed, fail, be cancelled or return different kinds of results. This module dicusses how to handle these situations clearly and consistently, and how these choices affect control flow, clarity and system behavior.
Messaging is often introduced to decouple components, but can easily increase complexity. This module explains why messaging patterns exist and how to apply them deliberately without turning systems into hard-to-follow workflows.
Microservices introduce significant operational and organizational cost. This module explains why modular monoliths offer a pragmatic alternative that enables strong boundaries without premature distribution.
Repository structure influences dependency management, team autonomy and evolution speed. This module explains why neither monorepos nor polyrepos are universally correct and how context determines their effectiveness.
Configuration and DI often start simple but degrade as systems scale. This module explains why lifecycle awareness and composition boundaries are critical to keep applications predictable and maintainable.
Reusable libraries often fail due to hidden assumptions about their consumers. This module explains why designing for unknown usage contexts is essential for adoption, longevity and safe evolution.
Third-party libraries introduce long-term risk beyond immediate functionality. This module explains why dependency choices are architectural decisions involving security, licensing and sustainability.
Quality does not scale through manual reviews alone. This module explains why automated quality gates are needed to enforce standards, protect architecture and keep delivery predictable.
Without observability, systems cannot be trusted in production. This module explains why structured telemetry enables faster diagnosis, better decisions and controlled operational cost.
How teams work with branches has a big impact on delivery speed and risk. This module explains why different branching strategies exist, how feature flags enable trunk-based development, and how the same flags can be used to safely release features and control deployments in production.
Native AOT improves startup time, memory usage and security, but not without trade-offs. This module explains the architectural consequences of choosing Native AOT and how those trade-offs affect real-world deployment scenarios.
IP protection requires more than just obfuscation. This module explains why code protection, secrets management and trust boundaries must be designed together to avoid false security.
The answer to the ultimate question of life, the universe and good architecture is: It depends. This training equips .NET architects to make principled trade-off decisions across architectural styles, deployment models and governance practices. It provides the insights needed to structure maintainable projects, enforce quality gates and balance developer productivity with long-term sustainability, without falling into common anti-patterns like leaky abstractions or dependency hell.
Senior .NET developers transitioning to architecture roles, solution architects designing enterprise-grade .NET applications and tech leads responsible for code quality, testing strategy, and architectural governance. Requires solid C#/.NET experience, no prior architecture training needed.